Research Snappy
  • Market Research Forum
  • Investment Research
  • Consumer Research
  • More
    • Advertising Research
    • Healthcare Research
    • Data Analysis
    • Top Companies
    • Latest News
No Result
View All Result
Research Snappy
No Result
View All Result

EPA won’t require industry to guarantee funding for toxic waste cleanups

researchsnappy by researchsnappy
November 25, 2020
in Advertising Research
0
EPA won’t require industry to guarantee funding for toxic waste cleanups
399
SHARES
2.3k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is declining to require oil and gas, coal, chemical and mining companies to have insurance to cover major spills and accidents.

Critics say the final rule, announced by the agency Wednesday, poses the greatest risk to communities of color and low-income communities that most often live in the shadow of polluting industries.

“EPA has found that existing environmental regulations and modern industry practices are sufficient to mitigate any risks inherent in these industries,” EPA Administrator Andrew WheelerAndrew WheelerOVERNIGHT ENERGY: Kerry says Paris climate deal alone ‘is not enough’ | EPA halts planned Taiwan trip for Wheeler| EPA sued over rule extending life of toxic coal ash ponds EPA halts planned Taiwan trip for Wheeler EPA sued over rule extending life of toxic coal ash ponds MORE said in a release announcing the rule, adding that “the financial risks from facilities in these industries are addressed by existing state and federal requirements.”

The rule targets the financial assurances the Obama administration argued should be required by major polluters, ensuring companies have sufficient means to cover any costs related to accidents in order to avoid dipping into Superfund hazardous waste cleanup coffers.

The U.S. has more than 1,300 Superfund sites on its cleanup list, but many have become “orphaned” by companies that go bankrupt and can no longer fund the cleanup.

“This is all so basic. It would just require that those companies have proof that if there is a release or spill of hazardous substances that there would be funds to clean it up so it’s not left on the taxpayers,” said Lisa Evans, an attorney with Earthjustice, who added that the Obama-era rules targeted “polluters that had most likelihood of creating releases.”

Typically that takes the form of buying accident insurance, something environmentalists see as another layer of protection, as insurers will often require additional safety protocols from companies, like building containment areas so spills don’t travel far beyond a facility.

“They will come and look at a facility and require that industry has certain safeguards in place so they won’t have a spill,” Evans said. “Industry will have to operate more safely if it has to get and maintain financial assurance — that’s just the way the world works.”

Environmental groups are likely to pressure the incoming Biden administration to revoke the rule. 

Previous Post

Global Insulated Wire and Cable Market Insight Growth Analysis on Volume, Revenue and Forecast to 2019-2025 – The Market Feed

Next Post

ID Faculty Discuss Gender Barriers in Academic Advancement

Next Post
ID Faculty Discuss Gender Barriers in Academic Advancement

ID Faculty Discuss Gender Barriers in Academic Advancement

Research Snappy

Category

  • Advertising Research
  • Consumer Research
  • Data Analysis
  • Healthcare Research
  • Investment Research
  • News
  • Top Company News

HPIN International Financial Platform Becomes a New Benchmark for India’s Digital Economy

Top 10 Market Research Companies in the world

3 Best Market Research Certifications in High Demand

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Antispam
  • DMCA
  • Contact Us

© 2025 researchsnappy.com

No Result
View All Result
  • Market Research Forum
  • Investment Research
  • Consumer Research
  • More
    • Advertising Research
    • Healthcare Research
    • Data Analysis
    • Top Companies
    • Latest News

© 2025 researchsnappy.com