Research Snappy
  • Market Research Forum
  • Investment Research
  • Consumer Research
  • More
    • Advertising Research
    • Healthcare Research
    • Data Analysis
    • Top Companies
    • Latest News
No Result
View All Result
Research Snappy
No Result
View All Result

Patient-reported causes of distress predict disparities in time to evaluation and time to treatment after breast cancer diagnosis

researchsnappy by researchsnappy
November 15, 2020
in Healthcare Research
0
Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: 1-Year Outcomes Predict 5-Year Outcomes
400
SHARES
2.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

This article was originally published here

Cancer. 2020 Nov 11. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33310. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We examined whether the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer (DT), a patient-reported outcome measure, could be used to identify levels and causes of distress associated with racial/ethnic disparities in time to care among patients with breast cancer.

METHODS: We identified women aged ≥18 years with stage 0-IV breast cancer who were diagnosed in a single health system between January 2014 and July 2016. The baseline visit was defined as the first postdiagnosis, pretreatment clinical evaluation. Zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression (modeling non-zero DT scores and DT scores = 0) and logistic regression (modeling DT score ≥ 4, threshold for social services referral) were used to examine associations between baseline score (0 = none to 10 = extreme) and types of stressors (emotional, familial, practical, physical, spiritual) after adjustment for race/ethnicity and other characteristics. Linear regression with log transformation was used to identify predictors of time to evaluation and time to treatment.

RESULTS: A total of 1029 women were included (median baseline DT score = 4). Emotional, physical, and practical stressors were associated with distress in both the ZINB and logistic models (all P < .05). Black patients (n = 258) were more likely to report no distress than Whites (n = 675; ZINB zero model odds ratio, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.68-4.40; P < .001) despite reporting a similar number of stressors (P = .07). Higher DT scores were associated with shorter time to evaluation and time to treatment while being Black and having physical or practical stressors were associated with delays in both (all P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported stressors predicted delays in time to care, but patient-reported levels of distress did not, with Black patients having delayed time to care despite reporting low levels of distress. We describe anticipatory, culturally responsive strategies for using patient-reported outcomes to address observed disparities.

PMID:33175437 | DOI:10.1002/cncr.33310

Previous Post

Marriott International Inc. (MAR) Just Got Our Attention

Next Post

Global Cabazitaxel Market 2020 – Impact of COVID-19, Future Growth Analysis and Challenges

Next Post
Global Cabazitaxel Market 2020 – Impact of COVID-19, Future Growth Analysis and Challenges

Global Cabazitaxel Market 2020 – Impact of COVID-19, Future Growth Analysis and Challenges

Research Snappy

Category

  • Advertising Research
  • Consumer Research
  • Data Analysis
  • Healthcare Research
  • Investment Research
  • News
  • Top Company News

HPIN International Financial Platform Becomes a New Benchmark for India’s Digital Economy

Top 10 Market Research Companies in the world

3 Best Market Research Certifications in High Demand

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Antispam
  • DMCA
  • Contact Us

© 2025 researchsnappy.com

No Result
View All Result
  • Market Research Forum
  • Investment Research
  • Consumer Research
  • More
    • Advertising Research
    • Healthcare Research
    • Data Analysis
    • Top Companies
    • Latest News

© 2025 researchsnappy.com